It uses a larger sensor than the C300 and the footage is more gradable because it is raw. The comparison above is shot at 1080p but with an anamorphic lens to correct the 3:2 aspect ratio, the 5D Mark III goes to 1280 lines from a full frame sensor, even higher in 1:1 crop mode. ![]() The 5D Mark III raw is impressive and compares closely to the C300, but has a few more tricks which elevate it. The extremely fine patterns also test for moire and false colour, as evidenced on the NEX 5N and 7D shots. It is the current benchmark, so interesting to see how close the 5D Mark III raw gets in 1080p.ġ2 o’clock shows vertical resolution, 3 o’clock shows horizontal. The Canon C300 is a very good albeit highly priced $15,000 HD camera, producing an ultra clean and detailed image by oversampling from the same 4K sensor as the C500. Here’s how the 5D Mark III in raw recording mode compares to the best 1080p output from the Canon C300 and 1D C. ![]() In the battle of the 1080p cameras, the game has changed. This test was conducted jointly with my good friend and neighbour Rudi at Slashcam – you can read his take on it in German / in English.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |